Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reserved people rules


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Speedy Deleted by NawlinWiki per CSD A1. Non-admin closure. UltraExactZZ Claims~ Evidence 03:10, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

Reserved people rules

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

I have nominated Reserved people rules, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Reserved people rules

Comment Could you please explain your rationale for deletion? VivioFa teFan  (Talk, Sandbox) 02:24, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

It is not encyclopedic. Fbdave (talk) 02:25, 22 January 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.