Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reservestridsproviant


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Field ration. Consensus is that the article does not meet the notability guidelines, but a redirect to Field ration has support. Davewild (talk) 18:45, 10 July 2012 (UTC)

Reservestridsproviant

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Fails WP:GNG. I almost couldn't find anything on it other than Wikipedia clones, but I did find one book (that doesn't seem to be based on Wikipedia) that mentioned it. Hardly enough coverage to justify an article. The article is completely unsourced, but I left it as is. Bbb23 (talk) 01:23, 3 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete We can't have an article without sources. Kitfoxxe (talk) 02:20, 3 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Norway-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 02:36, 3 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 02:37, 3 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 02:38, 3 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Strong delete not one hit in gnews. LibStar (talk) 02:56, 3 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment This needs a search in Atekst, but I don't have a subscription. I find a couple of mentions in the archives at Aftenposten and a couple of other mentions: 1 and 2 but nothing substantial. I can't find it in books either, which makes me think it may have previously had another name. Yngvadottir (talk) 05:14, 3 July 2012 (UTC)
 * An Atekst search finds three hits, all which are just passing mentions and none which can be used to establish notability. Arsenikk (talk)  13:13, 8 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment I asked here: Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Norway Anna Frodesiak (talk) 09:35, 3 July 2012 (UTC)
 * I find it hard to believe that this could not be covered in a larger article on soldier food. Geschichte (talk) 10:36, 3 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Field ration, for example. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 10:51, 3 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Redirect to Field ration, merging anything that can be properly sourced. With no decent sources and so little to say in any case, there's no cause for an article. There'd be more justification for (sweet) Fanny Adams, but the Royal Navy's tinned mutton just got an entry at the end of her article. Once she was dead, of course. Chiswick Chap (talk) 14:04, 3 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete or redirect to field ration as there does not seem to be any notable coverage of the topic. A search in Atekst (newspaper archive) and the national library archives finds nothing but passing mentioning, mostly in dictionaries. Arsenikk (talk)  13:13, 8 July 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.