Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reshma Rathore (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. Michig (talk) 09:28, 14 November 2015 (UTC)

Reshma Rathore
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

promotional and not yet notable  DGG ( talk ) 06:15, 7 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete as it seems there's something here at first, I'm simply not seeing much to separate this from any other usual Indian actress; "Reshma Rathore India actress" found several links at News, browser and WP:INDAFD but as I said nothing much better. Pinging interested subject users, , , , and , past AfD commenters ,  and  and new tagger .  SwisterTwister   talk  07:45, 7 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  07:45, 7 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  07:45, 7 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep. There were press articles about her recently in big newspapers: Dinakaran, Dina Malar, and this is 3 years after her lead role in the hit movie Ee Rojullo. Clearly notable imo. Biwom (talk) 07:47, 7 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep. Sources here give in-depth commentary such as in the Times of India here and here and elsewhere, suggesting she easily meets the general notability guideline. One could also use this search strategy for more news sources.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 12:32, 7 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep as meets GNG . – Davey 2010 Talk 15:39, 7 November 2015 (UTC)


 * > Using WP:INDAFD we find lots. See results for"Reshma Rathore"


 * Keep in full agreement that WP:GNG and WP:ENT are met, and notable awards meet WP:ANYBIO. Sorry, but WP:INDAFD offers great tools that address a systemic weakness in Google News, and with notability established, tone is a matter for cleanup, not deletion. Pinging . Cheers.  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 15:52, 7 November 2015 (UTC)
 * MQS, I can possibly accept the award, but are you aware of the reliability standards of Indian newspapers in this field?  DGG ( talk ) 06:43, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
 * I would think that any source determined as reliable for having editorial staff and reputation for fact-checking and accuracy would be suitable unless denied by WP:RSN. For example, the available Deccan Chronicle and Times of India seem to be eminently acceptable as RS for Indian-related topics.  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 00:01, 9 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep: as per Davey and Schmidt. -- Human 3015   TALK   09:22, 11 November 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.