Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Residence vs contact


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Merge to Children Act 1989. humblefool&reg;Deletion Reform 23:32, 2 August 2005 (UTC)

Residence vs contact
Text is so incoherent and fragmentary that I first put a (db) on it, which was promptly removed by the author bob tillings ; I'm putting a Vfd mostly to call it to the attention of Wiki pros who know how to deal with it. This said, although it must have some basis in fact, I think if I knew what it was, I'd still vote Delete. Bill 13:02, 15 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep and cleanup. The current article on The Children Act is very threadbare, and doesn't really have the structure that admits a merge at the moment, but might later. The Children Act is quite important over here so this is probably encyclopedic. Any lawyers out there able to help us out? -Splash 14:36, 15 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge As a lawyer, though an American one, I find it a very bad idea for this notion, which is defined by, and apparently created by, The Children Act to have a separate article. Iff no more competent authority offers to accomplish this, I'll do my best to do so. Xoloz 16:02, 16 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge per Xoloz. Radiant_ &gt;|&lt; 13:11, July 17, 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.