Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Residencial Manuel A. Perez


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Liz Read! Talk! 23:26, 3 June 2024 (UTC)

Residencial Manuel A. Perez

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails GNG, NGEO, NBUILDING. All sources are to news coverage, mostly of crime, that mentions the subject in passing as the location of the crime but does not provide significant coverage. No SIGCOV comes up in a BEFORE search either. Dclemens1971 (talk) 16:33, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Architecture and Puerto Rico. Shellwood (talk) 18:05, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep They aren't just passing mentions, there are also the article headlines. Plus the fact the place is on the news brings it notability. People in Puerto Rico talk about the place daily. Jeanette Tu Loca Sexy Martin (aqui?) 19:31, 13 May, 2024 (UTC)
 * Being in the headline is not the test of significant coverage. The articles are about other things in the news (crimes, individual people) that happen to mention the event happened/people lived in the Residencial Manuel A. Perez. Those events/people are getting the significant coverage. Dclemens1971 (talk) 19:51, 13 May 2024 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Doczilla  Ohhhhhh, no! 01:25, 21 May 2024 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Toadette Edit! 23:50, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Comments. I think the nomination is using the incorrect standards. This should be evaluated based on whether it's a notable neighborhood or complex; see User:Bearian/Standards. Bearian (talk) 23:41, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * I appreciate that you have developed an alternative way of thinking about apartment complexes, but at AfD I'm nominating on the basis of official policies, not personal essays that do not represent the consensus of the community. Dclemens1971 (talk) 01:28, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete The article and the sources are about some crimes that have taken place at this location, which I assume is being named as a residence complex. I don't see anything that would explain the significance of the named complex in these crimes. The residencia is a backdrop, not a foreground for the crimes. There would need to be more about the residencia itself for this article to be kept. Lamona (talk) 03:43, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete A BEFORE search brings up a lot of coverage, but it's not about the building itself, but rather about crime that occurs there. I think there's the possibility for an article, but in the very limited and narrow scope of "is this building notable," there's just not enough there on the complex itself to be notable under GNG. SportingFlyer  T · C  06:06, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
 * I do want to say that what is there may possibly be able to be included elsewhere in another article on residenciales. SportingFlyer  T · C  06:07, 3 June 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.