Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Resident Evil 4 (2007 film)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was KEEP.  Rob e  rt  02:05, 8 October 2005 (UTC)

Resident Evil 4 (2007 film)
Tagged as speedy by an anon without giving a reason. I'd guess they were going for the crystal ball argument. But since most of this is verifiable information, I'd be inclined to keep. - Mgm|(talk) 20:36, 28 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep its been announced and the claims of the article are verifiable. --best, kevin · · · Kzollman | Talk · · · 21:24, 28 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. Why didn't you just remove ths speedy notice?--Kross 22:38, 28 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Just to be on the safe side. I wanted to be sure I acted with the support of the community. - Mgm|(talk) 08:33, 29 September 2005 (UTC)


 * Keepthe film has been long announced and is clearly going to be made User:Empty2005
 * Keep. Announced films don't qualify for the crystal ball argument. 23skidoo 03:38, 29 September 2005 (UTC)
 * speedy keep this please the speedy notice should have just been removed we do not need to discuss this any more really Yuckfoo 04:41, 29 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, I thought speedy tags can be removed if it doesn't meet the criteria, as long as it isn't the article's creator. -- Kjkolb 08:06, 29 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Obvious Delete. This is a pure, 100%, uncut and unadulterated crystal-ball article. "Paul W. S. Anderson will write the script?" This is movie vaporware. --Calton | Talk 04:02, 1 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete or merge - I think it's a bit premature to include an article on the fourth Resident Evil film, when they haven't even started filming the third one yet. The only source that has even stated that a fourth film is in the works is the Hollywood Reporter and even if their info is correct, it's still speculative. I suggest to merge the info with Resident Evil: Apocalypse. Jonny2x4 06:26, 3 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep but cut. I think it is imperative that interested readers are notified about the fact that a possible 4th movie is at least in consideration. If all links and connections to this article is removed, this knowledge is lost. And knowledge, chrystal ball-ish or not, should never be lost at Wikipedia.--Pacroon 21:50, 6 October 2005 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.