Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Resilience (band)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 11:32, 12 July 2010 (UTC)

Resilience (band)

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Non-notable band. Hasn't hit any music charts that I can find. Fails WP:MUSIC. - Warthog Demon  03:15, 28 June 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –MuZemike 22:48, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Not notable. -- Rockstone  talk to me!   03:26, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment. I did find this article from Metro Silicon Valley. Not much else though.--Michig (talk) 05:51, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:14, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
 * And I found a brief discussion of them in this article in the Los Angeles Times. Paul Erik  (talk) (contribs) 00:58, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Delete I was also able to find one more bit of passing coverage, but so far only the Metro article seems to meet "non-trivial", so WP:MUSIC does not appear to be met. Close, though.  --  j &#9883; e decker  talk  20:26, 11 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. Doesn't meet threshold of notability. Coverage is too low. SPA. Christopher Connor (talk) 23:44, 11 July 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.