Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Resistance 3


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Speedy delete under criteria A1: "Articles lacking sufficient context to identify the subject of the article"

Resistance 3

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Blatant original research/crystal ball gazing. No sources Contested prod. Beeblebrox (talk) 01:23, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. MrKIA11 (talk) 01:25, 24 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Comment There was an AfD for Assassin's Creed 2 not too long ago under almost identical circumstances. Not enough information to warrant its own article.  Yet. ZappyGun  (talk to me)  What I've done for Wikipedia  04:57, 24 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete for now. I'd be shocked if a sequel didn't happen eventually, but from where we stand now this fails WP:CRYSTAL. Worth a mention in Resistance (series) if the "officially announced" assertion can be sourced, but the rest is just speculation. BryanG (talk) 07:03, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Pure speculation. No verifiable information present to write an article with. - Mgm|(talk) 11:04, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Resistance (series) "Resistance 3 is rumoured" No, thankyou. There is no need to try and sieve articles from gossip and forum chatter, there will be a point where enough reliable information is available and an article will be possible. It will continue from there until it is released and it will then be old news from there onwards. It's a shame so much contributor time is spent wrestling with speculation and constantly rebuilding articles on works-in-progress when it would only have to be done once if it was left till it was released. Oh well. Someoneanother 21:53, 25 February 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.