Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Resistive Connection Thermal Trauma


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete (non-admin closure: speedy G7 deletion). Mangoe (talk) 23:34, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

Resistive Connection Thermal Trauma

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Non-notable invented phrase. No GNews/Books/Scholar hits. GHits consist of Wikipedia, Linkin, and one promotional site. GregJackP  Boomer!   10:41, 29 August 2012 (UTC) delete this is a term that I have never met in over 30 years high level experience in the electrical distribution equipment market, such faults are invariably called poor or faulty connections, this appears to be a marketing - commercial invention — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rcdman (talk • contribs) 10:33, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete as promotional, NN, coinage.... I got seven GHits and nothing at all in books, and most of the GHits were us. Seems like jargonization of more common term "fire caused by bad connection". Mangoe (talk) 19:44, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 18:22, 30 August 2012 (UTC)

RCTT has been introduced to try and categorise this type of fault when reporting fires and to enhance awareness about a problem which causes fires. I can't see where you get that this is a marketing or commercial invention, it's a term given to a phenomenon which causes a fire. 176.255.66.137 (talk) 07:19, 1 September 2012 (UTC)
 * So, since it has just been introduced, it is unlikely to be notable yet, and this is for promotional purposes? Not exactly a strong argument.  (I also highlighted the delete vote of Rcdman, per normal AfD formating).   GregJackP   Boomer!   15:04, 1 September 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.