Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Respiratory research (journal)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy keep. withdraw as sources have been added and promotional matierial removed by Crusio. I will move the title to Respiratory Research (journal). (non-admin closure)  D u s t i *poke* 04:39, 4 January 2011 (UTC)

Respiratory research (journal)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Based on one reference or outer link (it's own website). Does not state how it is notable or endorsed, no links for verifibility. Mainly reads like a advertisement or "This is why you should read me" page.  D u s t i *poke* 07:55, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions.  -- Crusio (talk) 10:52, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions.  -- Crusio (talk) 10:52, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep Article was created by a very inexperienced editor (total of 13 edits) and proposed for speedy deletion 1 minute after creation. I have added an infobox, removed promotional language, and added some references. Journal is indexed in major databases and has very respectable impact factor, ranking it in the top 25% of its field. The article should be moved to a title with correct capitalization, "Respiratory Research (journal)", but I guess that will have to wait until this AfD has been closed. --Crusio (talk) 10:58, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep - Crusio has swooped in and saved the day, this article is highly referenced and is notable. Peter.C  •  talk  11:29, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep Please keep the article in place. It will be developed to better conform to the wikipedia template for articles about scientific journals. It is NOT intended for advertisement or marketing of a company. / Kind regards / Jan Lötvall / co-Editor-in-Chief Respir Res Jan.lotvall (talk) 11:32, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.