Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Responder apathy syndrome


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Lear's Fool 13:37, 9 May 2011 (UTC)

Responder apathy syndrome

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Per my 3O here. The article relates to a theory which does not appear to be discussed in third party reliable sources. Bob House 884 (talk) 10:35, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete as non-notable. Zero hits on Google Books, Scholar, News suggests that, if this exists at all, it is far from notable.  Sergeant Cribb (talk) 11:53, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete No hits, no where, not even strong enough to be a non-notable WP:NEO. Dennis Brown (talk) 20:56, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - Zero hits, no indication of notability. -- Joaquin008  ( talk ) 07:14, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.