Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Response ZT


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. m.o.p 23:39, 4 December 2011 (UTC)

Response ZT

 * – ( View AfD View log )


 * Delete. Non-notable product. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 19:56, 27 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Golf-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 00:19, 28 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep – Passes WP:GNG:
 * — Northamerica1000 (talk) 11:50, 29 November 2011 (UTC)
 * — Northamerica1000 (talk) 11:50, 29 November 2011 (UTC)
 * — Northamerica1000 (talk) 11:50, 29 November 2011 (UTC)
 * — Northamerica1000 (talk) 11:50, 29 November 2011 (UTC)
 * — Northamerica1000 (talk) 11:50, 29 November 2011 (UTC)
 * — Northamerica1000 (talk) 11:50, 29 November 2011 (UTC)
 * — Northamerica1000 (talk) 11:50, 29 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep 300,000 people bought it. Did those seeking to delete this bother to check Google News Archive?  It gets ample coverage.   D r e a m Focus  16:08, 29 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep Alan is just trying to delete notable golf clubs. CallawayRox (talk) 16:27, 2 December 2011 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.