Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reston ebolavirus


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. All content that might be suitable for merging is already present at Reston virus. Yunshui 雲&zwj;水 10:09, 31 August 2012 (UTC)

Reston ebolavirus

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

There already exists another article at Reston virus which has much of the same information, along with better references and far more detail. This page has been up for a merger for almost a year, with no response. As these two pages are very similar, I propose merging the relevant information into Reston virus, and renaming said article to Reston ebola virus per WP:COMMONNAME. Cheers, Zaldax (talk) 21:04, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Merge I agree. Unfortunately, this page is for discussing deletions, not merges. Us441(talk)(contribs) 21:07, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
 * If I'm not mistaken, the page may need to be deleted to accommodate the page move. (This article already exists at the title another article should exist at.) Cheers, Zaldax (talk) 21:11, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 00:30, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organisms-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 00:30, 25 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete. The topic is already covered at Reston virus, and the material here is problematic, with e.g. the "Species Inclusion Criteria" not matching what the source actually says. I see nothing here worth merging. -- 202.124.72.156 (talk) 02:43, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete, per the anon user.-- *Kat*  (meow?) 22:19, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.