Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Resumé (magazine)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Black Kite (talk) 22:25, 30 July 2012 (UTC)

Resumé (magazine)

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Completely unsourced, possible WP:GNG fail Mdann52 (talk) 07:55, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 02:05, 16 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 02:05, 16 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BusterD (talk) 14:13, 22 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep for now - I have heard of the magazine. Obviously proven to exist via sources. Needs improvements however but on the other hand that is not a reason for deletion.--BabbaQ (talk) 10:42, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep I notice that the Swedish Wikipedia has an article (our article appears to be a translation of the Swedish article). I believe that the users at WP:SW are better equipped than we are to judge the suitability of this article. I did find one source about it in English - not sure if it is a Reliable Source but I will add it to the article. --MelanieN (talk) 16:41, 29 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Oops - that's not an independent source, it's the magazine's publisher. --MelanieN (talk) 16:44, 29 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep. The magazine's articles are referenced by other media, and there are some articles and interviews referring to the magazine itself     . While I can't say much about their reliability (last two are blogs, but I see no reason to assume that they're unreliable, at least when it comes to assess notability), it seems clear to me that this is indeed a significant and well established trade magazine, and note that the last link states that it's been running for 50 years — Frankie (talk) 17:35, 30 July 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.