Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Resurrection Fighting Alliance


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Either creating a new article on Legacy Fighting Alliance and merging both into there, or nominating both articles for deletion are viable options. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 07:55, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

Resurrection Fighting Alliance

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable "feeder league" for more notable MMA organizations. Sourced to gossip/fan sites and regurgitated press releases; much content violates WP:NOT. Orange Mike &#124;  Talk  05:07, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete for lack of notability, poorly sourced. Deathlibrarian (talk) 08:57, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. Peter Rehse (talk) 11:39, 21 December 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:14, 29 December 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Merge into Legacy Fighting Championship as the two companies are set to merge. Dwanyewest (talk) 23:51, 29 December 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — MRD2014 (talk • contribs) 16:50, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Comment Legacy Fighting Championship and Resurrection Fighting Alliance are reportedly merging to become Legacy Fighting Alliance. It's not clear to me that either of these organizations have the coverage necessary to meet WP:GNG.  Coverage appears to be dominated by routine sports reporting.  A possibility is to combine RFA and LFC into a new article with redirects from both names.  Of course, another possibility is to delete both articles.  At this point, I don't really have a strong preference and also prefer not to get involved in this type of MMA discussion. Papaursa (talk) 03:47, 9 January 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.