Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Retail Grocery Inventory Service

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was KEEP The Land 18:45, 28 September 2005 (UTC)

Retail Grocery Inventory Service
This seems to be a bit of a commercial plug. I'm abstaining from voting, because I'm not too sure about it. - jmd 04:17, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment, no vote. Seems to be a legitimate company. Can't say if this page is a commercial plug. As it stands the page isn't worth much. There ought to be a guideline that if a page like this isn't expanded within a certain period of time, it should be deleted. It is of no informative value now. &spades; DanMS 04:54, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep - if the company has the global coverage, number of offices and size of workforce that the article asserts, I believe that's notable enough for an entry. CLW 16:13, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep The data in the article is (roughly) correct per RGIS web site. Groeck 16:52, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. Large enough to be notable. Owen&times; &#9742;  23:58, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep Company is huge (I worked for it one summer while in college), the article is small.  Assuming more is added, it's an easy keep. - Jaysus Chris 11:05, 24 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep as above comments ··gracefool |&#9786; 22:04, 25 September 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.