Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Retired Racehorse Project


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. –&#8239;Joe (talk) 06:54, 6 December 2018 (UTC)

Retired Racehorse Project

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No indication of notability. Much of the content is based on themselves, much of the content based on independent sources (e.g. the entire "Industry Issues" paragraph) isn't about the organization. I asked to take a look at the "ProQuest" sources; he couldn't find any of them on ProQuest. Those sources that I could locate did not cover the organization itself in any detail. Huon (talk) 22:11, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Maryland-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 22:33, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Animal-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 23:57, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 23:57, 13 November 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete for not meeting WP:ORGCRITE unless the supposedly-cited sources in RS like The Baltimore Sun are actually found and cover the subject in depth. signed,Rosguill talk 16:28, 14 November 2018 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- RoySmith (talk) 00:26, 21 November 2018 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sam Sailor 05:34, 28 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Sources have been provided on the talk page. It seems like the Baltimore Sun piece is really coverage for an event hosted by the subject coupled with some quotes by the organization's founder and thus doesn't seem to meet ORGCRITE. A link to ProQuest search results was also provided, but I cannot access the document. My vote remains unchanged, but will reconsider once the actual content of the ProQuest source is provided. signed,Rosguill talk 01:55, 29 November 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.