Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Retr0


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Rjd0060 (talk) 21:42, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

Retr0

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Zero ghits. Appears like entirely original research of a possible neologism. If notability can be established and references found, this can be stubbed, but I am doubtful. As is, needs a fundamental rewrite at the least. Tan  |   39  17:46, 19 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete seems to be original research - unless proper independent, published sources can be provided, this should be deleted. Gwernol 17:52, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - no evidence of passing notability guidelines and is unverifiable. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Belovedfreak (talk • contribs)
 * Delete per arguments above, moronic neologism. +Hexagon1 (t) 04:01, 23 April 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.