Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RetroVision Entertainment


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. L Faraone  02:25, 29 May 2013 (UTC)

RetroVision Entertainment

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No in-depth secondary sources establishing notability, no significant coverage. WP:COMPANY. I get the feeling the article is created for free advertising. Crispulop (talk) 18:08, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete No evidence that this company meets WP:CORPDEPTH. AllyD (talk) 19:54, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of North Carolina-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:05, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:05, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:05, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:05, 22 May 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete - No coverage in independent reliable sources. -- Whpq (talk) 16:44, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.