Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Retroactive Abortion (album)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   merge to Venomous Concept. J04n(talk page) 19:09, 25 March 2013 (UTC)

Retroactive Abortion (album)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable album. No evidence that it charted, and it is referenced only to a lone 183-word review which comes nowhere near satisfying WP:GNG.
 * Note that the article on the band is also at AFD: see Articles for deletion/Venomous Concept. Brown HairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 01:15, 10 March 2013 (UTC)

 Merge losslessly to Venomous Concept  - Album belongs to a band with at least two notable musicians. IMHO, the following steps need to be taken in order: --Jax 0677 (talk) 03:26, 10 March 2013 (UTC) As to the others, WP:NOTINHERITED, so we consider their notability independently. If there is material in this album article which can be merged to the article on the band without overwhelming that article, then it can of course be merged. How much of it to retain is an editorial decision involving WP:WEIGHT etc. -- Brown HairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 11:39, 10 March 2013 (UTC)
 * 1) Determine whether Kevin Sharp and Danny Herrera are notable
 * 2) Determine whether or not Venomous Concept is notable
 * 3) Determine whether or not Retroactive Abortion and Poisoned Apple are notable
 * 4) Determine whether or not Template:Venomous Concept is notable
 * Reply A template is a navigational device; it cannot be notable. The fact that you don't understand that suggests that yor general, grasp of the concept of notability is poor. Please read WP:N.

 Reply  - Sorry, I meant whether or not Template:Venomous Concept SHOULD BE KEPT!!! Again merge it losslessly. --Jax 0677 (talk) 00:58, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:52, 11 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:37, 17 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Merge to Venomous Concept. A Google search demonstrates that this has been reviewed in several reliable sources. I would go for a merge simply because the total content about the band will fit easily in one article. --Michig (talk) 07:33, 17 March 2013 (UTC)
 *  Reply  - Thank you Michig! --Jax 0677 (talk) 22:29, 17 March 2013 (UTC)
 * merge to Venomous Concept as suggested. Frietjes (talk) 15:20, 18 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Merge, same as Poisoned Apple. MrMoustacheMM (talk) 14:25, 25 March 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.