Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Retromotive


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  14:38, 7 April 2022 (UTC)

Retromotive

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Poorly-sourced stub about a non-notable publication. Only refs are to close and primary sites, and a search finds nothing better. The article is still fairly new, and I first considered draftifying, but that would only make sense if there were sources to be found, which I'm contending there aren't. Fails WP:GNG. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:28, 31 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:28, 31 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:28, 31 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:28, 31 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete. I couldn't find independent sources to support notability under WP:NMAGAZINE or WP:GNG. The only significant coverage is the Silodrome article (cited in article), however I question its independence, since Silodrome states in another article, We’re working with Retromotive Magazine to showcase their work to Silodrome’s large global audience, hopefully sending them some additional subscribers.. Schazjmd   (talk)  14:46, 31 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete - I'm not finding anything in a BEFORE search to establish notability by way of sources. This is not really an article, it is a list of their magazine topics. My sense is that this may be a "pay to play" publication, and that the article may be a promotional effort. The publication does not inherit the notability of the artists it features, and does not seem notable in its own right. Does not meet [{WP:GNG]] criteria for inclusion. Netherzone (talk) 14:55, 31 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete. Just what the nomination says. -- Hoary (talk) 06:26, 1 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete Promotional and fails GNG by a mile. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 13:07, 1 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails NMAGAZINE, fails GNG. Jacona (talk) 12:10, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete fails WP:NMAGAZINE and WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 12:47, 7 April 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.