Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Return (band)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Keep per consensus and WP:MUSIC. (non-admin closure) RMHED (talk) 19:11, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

Return (band)

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Non notable. Orphaned for nearly 2 years. No other sources but their home site. Simple searches yield nothing. Metal Head (talk) 14:23, 24 January 2008 (UTC) 
 * Keep. Several major label albums (easily verifiable via online shops), several hits on national charts (ref added). I've tagged it as needing more references, which is really the only problem with it. Not the easiest band name to search for and get meaningful results, but a band that has had hit albums is bound to have received coverage. --Michig (talk) 20:23, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep per Michig; band has had multiple major-label albums and at least one chart single, so they meet WP:MUSIC. Ten Pound Hammer  and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 16:26, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,


 * Speedy Keep This band was really big in Norway. I know this is the English-speaking Wikipedia, but nr 1 in a smaller country should qualify. Inserting a hit, like ,gives 23 K Ghits. Greswik (talk) 17:22, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep Clearly notable with charting hits. Chubbles (talk) 18:14, 29 January 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.