Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Return on Sustainability


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Kevin_Wilhelm. Lankiveil (speak to me) 05:26, 2 November 2013 (UTC)

Return on Sustainability

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Advertisement for non notable book Fiddle   Faddle  23:03, 25 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete. I found this CNET article, but that's the only non-promotional link I saw.  Not enough to establish notability. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:20, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Kevin Wilhelm. Assuming that the author's article isn't prone to deletion (it certainly needs cleaning), this would be reasonable to redirect. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   05:37, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Note that citations have been added to the article, but both are regurgitated press releases and qualify for a (so far) minor instance of WP:BOMBARD. A real citation is a discussion, not a regurgitation. Fiddle   Faddle  07:27, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:51, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:52, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:52, 27 October 2013 (UTC)


 * Redirect to Kevin Wilhelm. I see no coverage about this book that would establish independent notability. -- Whpq (talk) 16:33, 31 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Redirect as the reasonable solution. WorldCat shows the book in about 52 libraries. A notable English language book on a topic of wide interest would have many times that number.  DGG ( talk ) 19:52, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.