Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rev. James Keith Parsonage


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Nomination Withdrawn. (non-admin closure) D ARTH P ANDA duel &bull;  work 20:31, 23 January 2009 (UTC)

Rev. James Keith Parsonage

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Nice little old house near Plymouth, Massachusetts, preserved by a local historical society. While sites on the National Register of Historic Places are notable, due to the vast amount of coverage given to any such site, this definitely isn't NRHP, and it doesn't have the sources to make it notable otherwise. Nyttend (talk) 13:15, 21 January 2009 (UTC) Keep and merge. Probably similar to the friaries of Europe, has "ecological" notability for articles on urbanism. Ottre 17:27, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions.   -- the wub  "?!"  14:30, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
 * I'm confused: are you saying that it has something to do with ecology? At any rate, not all parsonages are notable: there's nothing to prevent any church with money from buying or building one.  Nyttend (talk) 19:49, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
 * I can't remember, sorry. Ottre 20:36, 21 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep According to this site, the structure is called the Rev. James Keith House. It was built in 1662 and it played a part in King Philip's War, according to pages 18-19 of this PDF: . I think we should try to rewrite the article. Pastor Theo (talk) 02:13, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep - It does seem to be of historic value and per the sources cited by Pastor Theo. --Oakshade (talk) 04:00, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
 * No complaints about non-NRHP historic buildings that have good sources — withdraw and someone who remembers how to close these things please close it. Nyttend (talk) 05:20, 22 January 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.