Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rev.com


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. KTC (talk) 01:57, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Rev.com

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing General notability guideline and the more detailed Notability (companies) requirement. I don't see any reliable coverage required by NCOMPANY/GNG. Sources include TechCrunch, which I classify as a trade journal covering nearly anything related to Internet start ups (and trade journals are not considered sufficient for NCOMPANY, see recent discussion on it's talk page), a passing mention in the WSJ start up column, and another low reliabilitry niche, local trade journal. As I discussed in my Signpost Op-Ed, this is a good example of Yellow-Pages like company spam. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 06:09, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions.  Musa  Talk  06:43, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions.  Musa  Talk  06:43, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions.  Musa  Talk  06:43, 10 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete - I searched online and found no significant, substantive coverage other than the two referenced articles that cover the same event, an initial funding.--Rpclod (talk) 06:59, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - Nothing to enhance its improvement and notability. SwisterTwister   talk  07:49, 14 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - non-notable, created by SPA with probable COI. Citobun (talk) 10:47, 17 November 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.