Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reva Forth


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 09:19, 9 November 2015 (UTC)

Reva Forth

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Lacks reliable independent secondary sources to establish notability as required by WP:GNG. Sources offered and all those I could find by Googling all trace back to websites owned by the author of this product. Wikipedia is not for WP:PROMOTION. Msnicki (talk) 01:43, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. North America1000 04:50, 2 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete Promotion for a personal project of the article's creator, and in eight years no independent references or indications of notability have been added.  Rwessel (talk) 06:29, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. —Ruud 22:31, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete. Unable to find sources establishing notability. APerson (talk!) 17:30, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:BIO. Fails notability criteria.  Blue Rasberry   (talk)  18:19, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
 * While I don't disagree, presumably you meant a policy other than WP:BIO? Perhaps WP:NSOFT?  Rwessel (talk) 01:51, 5 November 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.