Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Revali


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__ to Characters of The Legend of Zelda. Liz Read! Talk! 04:44, 16 July 2023 (UTC)

Revali

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Just like Daruk, which is already nominated for deletion, this character very likely fails GNG. All sources in the Reception section are either Velnet lists (ignored for notability discussions, even more so because they are lists) or discussing wanting the Champions (note the plural) in Smash Ultimate. Outside of the reception section, 7 of the articles sources are primary, most from the same book, and yet even more Velnet, and what isn't Velnet doesn't talk about Revali enough to warrant anything outside of a section in Characters of The Legend of Zelda. This article should be merged into it. Mipha and Urbosa might have potential, though, especially Urbosa. NegativeMP1 (talk) 05:28, 9 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements and Video games. Shellwood (talk) 10:32, 9 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Merge to Characters of The Legend of Zelda. No indication of standalone notability for this character. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 11:31, 9 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Merge to Characters of The Legend of Zelda. Unfortunately, I don't think he has enough coverage to warrant a page, it's really just listicle things and trivial mentions + the creating a champion primary source. ULPS (talk) 15:34, 9 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Merge. Like Daruk, Revali simply isn't that notable, at least according to the article and my research. I agree with the assessment on Urbosa, and am unsure about Mipha. - Cukie Gherkin (talk) 01:17, 10 July 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.