Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Revealed with Jules Asner


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Sourcing identified and included here counters nom assertion of no hits. Star  Mississippi  23:37, 16 May 2022 (UTC)

Revealed with Jules Asner

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Completely unsourced since 2008. Zero hits on GNews, GBooks, TelevisionWeek archives. Newspapers.com hits were 100% TV Guide listings. Contested prod. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 01:30, 1 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 01:30, 1 May 2022 (UTC)

Keep per the significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources.  The article notes: "E! seems to be throwing its full weight behind Jules Asner and her series "Revealed" (10 p.m. weeknights), in which Asner slobbers over stars. Asner doesn't work hard. All she does is latch onto the latest celebrity who's plugging a new movie and then she lobs embarrassing softball questions. Nothing's "revealed" except that Asner can't ask anything tough or truly revealing. Her interview with Celine Dion was nauseatingly sugary. On Wednesday, Asner goes toe-to-toe with Angelina Jolie, the star who has committed many sharing violations and spills more than you ever wanted to know. Even in this situation, count on Asner to tread lightly. The title of the show should be changed from "Revealed With Jules Asner" to "Congealed With Jules Asner" because each interview turns into a sticky, sycophantic mess." The article notes: "E! kicks off the new interview series "Revealed with Jules Asner" with back-to-back chats with two of Hollywood's biggest stars. The "E! Daily News" host talks with George Clooney at 8 p.m., followed by Julia Roberts at 9 p.m. Both actors discuss their roles in the forthcoming film "Ocean's Eleven," the remake of the 1960 Rat Pack heist movie. ... Asner promises to get personal stories from her subjects and share early screen tests and other visual goodies with her audience. "Revealed" will air on Wednesdays at 10 p.m., beginning on Dec. 12."  The article notes: "E! Entertainment Television's two-hour preem of bio skein “Revealed With Jules Asner” rated higher than any other series preem in the basic cabler's 11-year history. The two-parter featuring segs on “Ocean's Eleven” stars George Clooney and Julia Roberts, from 8–10 p.m. on Wednesday, averaged a .93 cable rating, or 707,000 households. The first part, on Clooney, earned an average .84 cable rating (640,000); viewership went up during the Roberts seg to a 1.01 cable rating (823,000 households)." The article notes: "now she hosts her own show, Revealed with Jules Asner, a perfectly pleasant interview show with all the hot young newsmakers from the world of entertainment. ... Ms. Asner was being a little tough on herself. She's managed to get a number of stars to open up about themselves, and she's learned to ask the tough questions, too. ... Ms. Asner said that when she first started doing Revealed, the people behind the show wanted her to ask stars how they lost their virginity. She said she wouldn't do it."  The article notes: "Maybe that "Ocean's Eleven" overkill wasn't so dumb after all. It helped E! Entertainment Television's two-hour premiere of bio series "Revealed With Jules Asner" to the cable outlet's highest ratings for a series debut in its 11-year history. Asner's George Clooney interview attracted 640,000 homes, and her chat with Julia Roberts drew 823,000. It probably didn't hurt that Asner is dating "Ocean's" director Steven Soderbergh. "There is sufficient coverage in reliable sources to allow Revealed With Jules Asner to pass Notability, which requires "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject". Cunard (talk) 12:06, 1 May 2022 (UTC) </li></ul>

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   09:22, 8 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment: Pinging, who contested the proposed deletion. Cunard (talk) 12:06, 1 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep sources shared by Cunard demonstrate notability per WP:GNG NemesisAT (talk) 22:50, 1 May 2022 (UTC)
 * <p class="xfd_relist" style="margin:0 0 0 -1em;border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 2em;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.