Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Revelations


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Revelation (disambiguation). There is a clear consensus to redirect, but not as to where. I recommend further discussion, preferably at Talk:Revelations or similar discussion venue to establish a consensus on where the redirect should be. –MuZemike 22:41, 13 October 2010 (UTC)

Revelations

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )
 * Since moved to
 * Since moved to

Editor keeps changing the redirect to an article--for a non-notable song. It wasn't a single, it's not famous, there are no references that indicate its notability. The only thing I could find is, on PopMatters, which mentions a live version of the song on Life After Death. Basically, I bring this here to get the community's input on whether this should be an article or remain a redirect. Drmies (talk) 15:04, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Redirect as appropriate - not enough material for a stand-alone article. Eddie.willers (talk) 15:33, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Redirect, not significant enough coverage to get an article in decent shape out of it. C628 (talk) 18:38, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:12, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Redirect and can an admin please fix this? The editor changed the Revelations redirect to be a Iron Maiden song article even though there's already Revelations (Iron Maiden song) which redirects to the album (as it should.) The page at Revelations needs to redirect to Revelation (disambiguation) as it did before the editor replaced it with the Iron Maiden content; the content that's being AfD'ed here needs to be moved to the Revelations (Iron Maiden song) page as it's wholly inappropriate for the Iron Maiden song to usurp the Revelations redirect page. 28bytes (talk) 11:19, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
 * I've fixed this, but to clarify, prior to the redirect becoming an article, it redirected to Revelation. I've no opinion on the ideal target. – xeno talk 14:17, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks Xeno. I must have been looking at an earlier revision that pointed to the disambig. 28bytes (talk) 15:01, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Redirect - As it was previous to the article. If the notability of the song can be established at some point, then it can become an article. - Burpelson AFB ✈ 13:56, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Redirect back to Revelation (disambiguation). Entirely non-notable as a song; even if it were it should be at Revelations (Iron Maiden song), but by WP:SNOW it would be equally non-notable there.-- JohnBlackburne wordsdeeds 14:00, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Administrative note:: I've split out the new revisions and merged them with Revelations (Iron Maiden song). Revelations has thus reverted back to being a redirect to Revelation. Discussion continues with respect to Revelations (Iron Maiden song). – xeno talk 14:04, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment: Just to clarify, now that the page has been moved, my "redirect" !vote above is intended to mean that Revelations (Iron Maiden song) should be redirected to Piece of Mind, the album's page. 28bytes (talk) 15:05, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
 * I agree with all of you. Let's have a group hug--and we may as well ask for SNOW. Drmies (talk) 02:33, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Redirect to the album Piece of Mind, just to help build the consensus. The song does not stand on its own nor does it need to if it is discussed in passing at the album article. Also, if the stubborn editor keeps de-redirecting and messing up the namespace for the much more important Revelations (from religion), is there a salt-like process to prevent similar moves in the future? This discussion here might not discourage the guy, until he gets bored and goes somewhere else. -- D OOMSDAYER 520  (Talk|Contribs) 14:20, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
 * I've got Revelations watch-listed. I don't think the editor intentionally broke things, I think it's just a matter of misunderstanding where the article should have been created. If it happens to a high-visibility redirect again I think we can safely just revert the change and explain on his talk page warn without needing to go the AfD route (although I've got no complaints with Drmies' handling of the situation.) 28bytes (talk) 16:06, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.