Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reverse Osmosis (group)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. I cannot close as a merge as the content is unsourced. Happy to provide the content to someone if they wish to source it before merging. Daniel (talk) 22:24, 21 March 2021 (UTC)

Reverse Osmosis (group)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

A possibly non-notable band. Not much source found about the band and much of the information on the website seems to be original research. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 22:03, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 22:03, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 22:03, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 22:03, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Would like more input into Adamant1's suggestion.
 * Selectively Merge The first section of the article to University of Southern California or one of it's apparently many sub pages. I think that would be a good alternative to straight deletion. Since it looks like they have a lot of records and a little notoriety, just not enough to warrant an article by Wikipedia's standards. That said, maybe someone could argue that a merge isn't a good option because of the current length of the University of Southern California article. To which I say, does it really need things like an individual picture for every single Notable USC alumni or four paragraphs about the marching band? Likely not. Especially if it comes at the cost of mentioning a band in the article that has multiple album releases and a documentary about them. Can that be said about the marching band? I think not. --Adamant1 (talk) 04:58, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ritchie333 (talk) <sup style="color:#7F007F">(cont)  13:01, 5 March 2021 (UTC) <div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 18:29, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete I might not have been very creative with my searching, but I found nothing to suggest the group has received significant coverage in independent reliable sources, a merger feels as though it will be undue and a circumnavigation of deletion which is imo the proper outcome. I could similarly find no independent/reliable coverage of the 'documentary' about the group other than a press release from the seemingly non-notable Delray Film Festival. Given the complete absence of WP:SIGCOV, oppose merger. Eddie891 Talk Work 22:32, 13 March 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.