Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reversed innovation process


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. —Tom Morris (talk) 13:17, 8 January 2013 (UTC)

Reversed innovation process

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I do not think this describes anything with a real existence--certainly not anything that is notable. All of the works cited describe either general processes of innovation, or describe reverse innovation--as mentioned in the article, that's a different concept--developing innovation in the 3rd world, and then spreading it to the more industrialized nations

I can find nothing published that actually describes what is presented here using this name. The article is written as if this were copied from a presentation, but I have not identified the source. .  DGG ( talk ) 07:25, 1 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 07:34, 1 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 07:34, 1 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Strong delete as I originally noted when I PRODded the article back in October: no sources to establish notability, and heavily promotional in tone. &mdash;Darkwind (talk) 19:46, 1 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete - Lacks reliable sources. --Sue Rangell ✍ ✉ 21:38, 2 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete Can't find any independent reliable source on this. Did some cursory searches of references listed in the Bibliography section and don't find occurrences of the article title there. -—Kvng 03:53, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.