Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Review of Business and Economics Studies


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 17:04, 6 February 2023 (UTC)

Review of Business and Economics Studies

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Article PRODed with reason "Non-notable journal. Not indexed in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG." Article dePRODed by article creator without stated reason but after addition of some material (diff). Some of it is incorrect (an impact factor is claimed, but the journal is not indexed by the JCR), the rest is trivial (e.g., inclusion in Researchgate, indexing by GScholar, etc). None of the references contribute to notability under GNG. PROD reason still stands, hence: Delete. Randykitty (talk) 15:28, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academic journals, Business, Economics,  and Russia. Randykitty (talk) 15:28, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete - Fails GNG. Not indexed by any selective databases, as far as I can tell, so fails WP:NJOURNAL. WJ94 (talk) 15:59, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Hello,
 * I'd like to respond to a couple of points and provide clarification:
 * - "Not indexed by any selective databases" - This point is not correct. In the additional material, it is stated that "The journal is included in the Russian Science Citation Index – a selective component of the Scientific Electronic Library ru:eLIBRARY.RU." Only some/selective journals from the eLibrary.ru are admitted to the Russian Science Citation Index - a selective database. GNG does not specify which selective databases should be taken into account and which should not.
 * - "... incorrect (an impact factor is claimed, but the journal is not indexed by the JCR)...". There are no incorrect claims. In the additional material, it is clearly stated which impact factor is meant - with a reference to the source: Russian Science Citation Index. Yes, this is not JCR IF.
 * - "no independent sources". This point is not correct. In the additional material, it is demonstrated that the RoBES journal is indexed by more than half a dozen well-established databases. These sources may not count for "selective" databases, however, they are definitely "independent" reliable sources.
 * - RoBES papers have been cited multiple times: listed in the article papers have 30-50 citations in Google Scholar.
 * - RoBES has a solid history of over 10 years of sustainable service to the worldwide economics community. Arguably, RoBES is one of the first English-language economics journals in Russia.
 * Please reconsider. A. Bokov (talk) 21:00, 30 January 2023 (UTC)


 * Unfortunately, none of the above contributes to notability under either NJournals or GNG. --Randykitty (talk) 22:27, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Not agreeing with the decision, but to avoid delays, suggest merging RoBES article with the article on the parent organization - Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation. OK? A. Bokov (talk) 03:22, 2 February 2023 (UTC)


 * Delete. As standalone article, it doesn't meet WP:N. It could be merged to to Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation however. &#32; Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 12:29, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete - Fails WP:GNG and WP:NJOURNAL. Onel 5969  TT me 15:00, 5 February 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.