Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Revista de Derecho de la Universidad Nacional del Altiplano de Puno


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 19:30, 10 August 2021 (UTC)

Revista de Derecho de la Universidad Nacional del Altiplano de Puno

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Article PRODded with reason "Non-notable journal. Not indexed in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG." Article dePRODded with reason "I request not to delete, be patient with the development of the scientific journal." PROD reason stands, therefore: Delete. Randykitty (talk) 07:36, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Peru-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 08:12, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academic journals-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 08:14, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
 * The journal meets most criteria and has independent sources (MIAR, Latindex, DOAJ), in addition, according to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Notability_(academic_journals), it does not order to delete the page, and does not prohibits keeping the journal on a list of non-featured journals. I request not to delete the page and change its category to a corresponding one such as a magazine or similar. Micnous (talk) 21:51, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment: None of these indexes are selective in the sense of WP:NJournals. Changing categories to magazine does not change anything, as it does not meet any notability criteria for magazines either. This journal may become notable a few years from now, in that case the article can be recreated. --Randykitty (talk) 05:41, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the response, I reiterate the request not to delete the article, I invoke the application of the principle of flexibility located in the draft UNESCO Recommendation on Open Science, this added to a human criterion of interest in promoting emerging open journals for that reason I ask to keep the journal as a lower level, to de-categorize it as a prominent or notable journal, but not to purge it because it is not part of a demanding metrics business circuit managed by companies not compatible with UNESCO. In fact Wikipedia should promote open science by incorporating developing journals, with the deletion it is only possible to discourage emerging journals, I rely on point 21.f of the aforementioned UNESCO document that says:
 * (f) Ensuring diversity in scholarly communications with adherence to the principles of open, transparent and equitable access and supporting non-commercial publishing models and collaborative publishing models with no article processing charges or book processing charges; Micnous (talk) 18:16, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Please see what WP is not. --Randykitty (talk) 18:54, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Finally, I suggest creating the category: journals without notable or Non-notable journal. Micnous (talk) 18:56, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Unfortunately, WP does not cover subjects that are not notable. --Randykitty (talk) 19:09, 28 July 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   12:24, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete not yet notable per the relevant criteria, and no indication it meets GNG. Star   Mississippi  16:52, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete This journal has not yet met the criteria for notability per GNG and NJOURNALS. It is not listed in the required databases and there is no independent coverage in outside sources. ---Steve Quinn (talk) 18:22, 9 August 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.