Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Revival (Selena Gomez song)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Firm consensus that notability was established very clearly Nosebagbear (talk) 01:25, 11 January 2020 (UTC)

Revival (Selena Gomez song)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

After a search on the web, I couldn't find any sources that jusity the existence of this song as a standalone article besides reviews in the context of the album, the user who created this page has been blocked several times for creating and recreating articles that shouldn't have existed in the first place. On top of that, and according to the guidelines of W:NS, it doesn't satisfy the charts criteria, not that it means it will be notable, never won one or more significant awards or honors, such as a Grammy, Juno, Mercury, Choice or Grammis award and it has not been independently released as a recording by several notable artists, bands, or groups. Furthermore, the sample needed to be reduced to comply with the wiki policie on WP:MS. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 01:23, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 02:22, 4 January 2020 (UTC)


 * Keep Did you look at the dozen in the article? Please stop nominating articles that meet notability criteria. Walter Görlitz (talk) 02:57, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Strong keep Please. This is like the recent AfD for a Taylor Swift song. There is no doubt that most of Selena Gomez's songs are notable. Ambrosiawater (talk) 03:05, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep There are a dozen sources, most of which are reviews, which give significant coverage to this song. Being the title song of chart topping record, it is quite notable. Captain Eek  Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 04:31, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep - this is getting ridiculous. The nominator clearly doesn’t understand the notability guidelines. Please stop with these nominations until you better familiarize yourself on where we draw the lines on these sorts of things. It’s not here. Sergecross73   msg me  05:13, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America1000 12:25, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
 * They are reviews within the album. Not stand alone reviews. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 14:13, 4 January 2020 (UTC)


 * Keep --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 15:12, 7 January 2020 (UTC)
 * 'Keep - title cut from a hugely successful LP issued by a major label by a globally-known artist, performed at the MTV awards. There's plenty of coverage already in the article, some of it primarily about the album for context, but with details about the motivation for and meaning of the lyrics of this song. 21:38, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Comment non self published sources from the article
 * scenestr Just the one sentence She wrapped up her final Australian show with 'Revival', thanking the crowd and promising she'd be back soon.
 * Live Jpournal Blog Has a description of each track, Not a good source anyway
 * Time interview Only mentions revival twice when talking about "Kill ‘Em With Kindness".
 * Rolling Stone Just talks about the album
 * idolator Again covers each track
 * USA today album review Just the two sentences The title track announces her musical agenda, with synth sparkling and guitars crunching over a syncopated beat. Gomez's vocals are spare and cool, sensual but discreet.
 * Rolling stone album review Can't find a mention of the title track
 * Slant album review Has a paragraph which ties into the title track
 * I don't know the history of the nominator that is being brought up, but this is hardly a slam dunk of notability. AIRcorn (talk) 22:26, 10 January 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.