Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Revive Energy Mints


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. BJ Talk 04:56, 19 December 2008 (UTC)

Revive Energy Mints

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable product, per Deletion_policy/Brand_name_products: If the article is obvious advertising for an item that most people otherwise wouldn't have heard of, it should be deleted. --fvw *  21:38, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete I nominated this article for a procedural deletion. The original contributor removed the PROD tag, hence this nomination. --Call me Bubba (talk) 21:58, 14 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep I surely do not think this article should be deleted. While, it is a relatively new product, as noted in the article, it is on shelves in stores, sold online, and has been featured in several magazine articles.Energyfreak (talk) 22:07, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete If there are any magazine articles on this, there certainly isn't any evidence on the web; the only news ghit is a press release, and there are exactly 121 ghits otherwise, many of which are adverts for vending distributorships for these. Pretty clear failure to satisfy WP:N and WP:BURDEN. At best, per WP:PRODUCT, this should be merged to an article on the manufacturer, if one existed. &mdash;/M endaliv /2¢/Δ's/ 01:47, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete The product’s supporters have shown a pattern of abusive “contribution” to multiple Web fora, as a search like Mendaliv’s shows, and zero evidence of satisfying notability. —  crism ( talk )  06:56, 15 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions.   -- the wub  "?!"  12:35, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep This product is licensed to private distributors. The conduct of its distributors does not reflect that of the product's sponsors.  To anyone questioning the verifiability of the claim that the product has been featured in several publications, please contact the parent company and they will gladly provide you with a reprint of a recent copy of TrueWealth Magazine, in which the product was featured. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.176.50.114 (talk • contribs)
 * Delete or Merge into the general article Energy mint. I agree that this article does not satisfy WP:N and WP:BURDEN. Insufficient third-party references found to support notability. Geoff  TC 20:28, 17 December 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.