Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Revolution 9


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy keep. Frank |  talk  02:59, 5 May 2010 (UTC)

Revolution 9

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Delete!!! Non-notable Non charting. OttomanJackson (talk)
 * Strong keep Beatles song with huge amount of cultural impact and study, among their most controversial songs. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  23:52, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep and comment This is the second article on a Beatles song that this editor has nominated for deletion in the past few days; see Articles for deletion/Lucy in the Sky with Diamonds. This editor appears to have a bias, as well no understanding of notability. I have already given them a final warning, and I suggest that an admin monitor this editor as their disruption is now getting beyond a joke.  Pyrrhus  16 ''' 00:03, 5 May 2010 (UTC)
 *  Keep  - a highly notable recording by a highly notable band. Take a glance at the nom's talk page.   R ad io pa th y  •talk•   01:11, 5 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep per WP:SNOW - see Articles for deletion/Lucy in the Sky with Diamonds. Disruptive nom.   R ad io pa th y  •talk•   01:22, 5 May 2010 (UTC)
 * What do You mean - notable. It did not chart and Is not one of there better known songs. I hate the Beatles and this song is not notable. Merge into appropriate album article OttomanJackson (talk) 01:53, 5 May 2010 (UTC)


 * Strong Keep - seems like an extremely WP:POINTy nomination. Beyond My Ken (talk) 02:49, 5 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep, this track was and still is incredibly controversial, and was also a introduction for many fans of more "pop" music to musique concrete and the avant garde in general. I hope my reasons make sense in terms of wikipedia's rules. Huw Powell (talk) 02:50, 5 May 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.