Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Revolution Parkour


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone  00:11, 20 March 2009 (UTC)

Revolution Parkour

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

No reliable secondary sources, other than blogs and forums. Anti venin  08:28, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, fails WP:ORG. MuffledThud (talk) 09:10, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete No significant coverage in reliable sources to establish notability. Apropos of nothing, that is a hell of a lot of 'parkour's. Maralia (talk) 16:57, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - Search of most major media sources turns up zero hits, fails WP:N/WP:CORP/WP:ORG and anything else. Aboutmovies (talk) 00:17, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete It is pure advertisement and I believe, will hard to be notable this academy one day. Carlosguitar (Yes Executor?) 11:53, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Edit - This page needs editing, but it should remain. It is an established company in a small and emerging industry which is why there is a lack of press releases about it. The company has worked, and is currently working on, international projects that have not yet been released to the public. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Urbanresource (talk • contribs) 05:08, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Actually no significant media coverage is one of the primary reasons most articles fail WP:N. There's no way to verify the information. Nor to establish notability. Anti  venin  13:24, 18 March 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.