Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rex Is Not Your Lawyer


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) Tim Song (talk) 03:51, 18 February 2010 (UTC)

Rex Is Not Your Lawyer

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Ok it got press coverage, but it's an unaired TV pilot. Ridernyc (talk) 15:42, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep - So what if it's an unaired TV pilot? The references are full of reliable and verifiable sources. Plus, I wasn't aware that being a failed TV pilot was grounds for deletion - perhaps you should take a look at Heat Vision and Jack, or this category? Or this one? TheRealFennShysa (talk) 16:29, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep I think the fact that it has received significant coverage from a variety of reliable sources is the exact reason why it is notable and should be kept. Angryapathy (talk) 16:53, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep- received enough coverage to achieve notability, despite just being a pilot. Its hardly the first time a pilot has achieved notability on its own.Umbralcorax (talk) 18:44, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep. Satisfies WP:NOTE. Has received significant coverage in reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Cirt (talk) 19:18, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep: Passes WP:EPISODE. Joe Chill (talk) 23:14, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.