Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rex Liu


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete ZsinjTalk 16:51, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

Rex Liu
Rex Liu}} – (View AfD) (View log) Non-notable bassoonist and composer. Could find no reliable sources on the web or in music databases (JSTOR, New Grove). Article has been deleted twice and each time recreated. Request block on recreation of article after AfD or Speedy Delete A7. Myke Cuthbert 19:55, 12 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletions.  -- Pete.Hurd 20:04, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: There is also a deletion request, for the same article, on French Wikipedia (fr:Rex Liu). See fr:Wikipédia:Pages à supprimer/Rex Liu. Hégésippe | ±Θ± 19:51, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
 *  speedy delete & salt CSD G4 . Note: claim to notability seems to be "He has spoken on music history at various universities, including a lecture given at the University of Alberta" which falls very short of WP:PROF. Pete.Hurd 20:07, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Well, if "at" meant "at an invited lecture at" and "various" equaled, say, twenty, then we could start to talk about it as a claim of WP:PROF; but somehow, I think you're right that it's not. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Mscuthbert (talk • contribs) 20:35, 12 May 2007 (UTC).
 * Speedy Delete - CSD G4: Recreation of deleted material --YbborTalk 22:14, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Thank you for the clarification Pan Dan. --YbborTalk 19:54, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, let's give it community consensus before salting. Another clear case of accomplishment not amounting to notability. --Dhartung | Talk 22:51, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Is there the equivalent of "salt until X date"? I would support a month or two cooling period more than a permanent block on recreation.  The problem is that the article has been created three times in less than a month, and now the principal editor has learned to revert "speedy" tags, so I can easily see going through this process again.  (I do wish that when someone creates an article which has already been AfD'd, that the system would show them why the previous article was deleted and ask editors to commit to writing an article which does not have these issues).  --Myke Cuthbert 03:26, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Why should the burden be on us? Let a future editor take it to DRV if there is new information. --Dhartung | Talk 04:23, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Concur with Dhartung. Pete.Hurd 05:53, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Myke, on your parenthetical comment, we have repost-warn for wp:csd's. Pan Dan 15:29, 13 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete. Like the nominator I could not verify any of this. (But not wp:csd which only applies to things that have already been AFD'd.) Pan Dan 15:29, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, a quick search turns up little to spur me on. John Vandenberg 15:46, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.