Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rexhep Thaqi


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Drmies (talk) 03:54, 17 October 2015 (UTC)

Rexhep Thaqi
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:NFOOTY, never played in a fully professional league Ymblanter (talk) 07:48, 10 October 2015 (UTC)


 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone  10:00, 10 October 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. GiantSnowman 10:09, 10 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. — Jkudlick t c s 11:28, 10 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. — Jkudlick t c s 11:29, 10 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Kosovo-related deletion discussions. — Jkudlick t c s 11:29, 10 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Switzerland-related deletion discussions. — Jkudlick t c s 11:29, 10 October 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete - Subject has not played senior international football and currently does not play in a WP:FPL. — Jkudlick t c s 11:38, 10 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep - on account of subject's extraordinary height (183m) 94.12.160.252 (talk) 21:27, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Not a valid reason to keep the article. It looks like this comment has been added for fun.--Ymblanter (talk) 00:53, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
 * I corrected the height in the infobox. My !vote still stands. — Jkudlick t c s 11:37, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - Fails WP:NFOOTY as has not played senior international football nor played in a fully professional league. No indication that subject has garnered significant reliable coverage for any other achievements to satisfy GNG. Fenix down (talk) 08:10, 12 October 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.