Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rexroad Formation


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. RL0919 (talk) 14:11, 24 January 2020 (UTC)

Rexroad Formation

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This links to List of fossiliferous stratigraphic units in Kansas and there is not enough information to constitute a standalone page. Information can be easily merged into List of fossiliferous stratigraphic units in Kansas PenulisHantu (talk) 12:03, 17 January 2020 (UTC)


 * Keep: Article length is not a deletion criterion. Abyssal (talk) 12:28, 17 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Kansas-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 12:33, 17 January 2020 (UTC)


 * Keep as a valid stratigraphic article stub with potential for expansion. Vsmith (talk) 12:40, 17 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep found a good number of listings and descriptions in Google Books, more than enough to pass WP:GNG. Sources need to be added to the article, but that is an editing issue and not a deletion issue.  As to the length of the article, do not confuse stub status with non-notability.--Paul McDonald (talk) 13:44, 17 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep Short but notable, with named fossiliferous material identified from it, plus cited and sourced.-- Kev  min  § 19:28, 17 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 04:37, 19 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 04:37, 19 January 2020 (UTC)


 * Keep. With 291 hits in Google Scholar for the exact phrase "Rexroad Formation", 75 hits for publications that include "Rexroad" in their title, and two that have this exact phrase in their title  this seems like an easy pass of WP:GNG. —David Eppstein (talk) 05:00, 19 January 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.