Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reyna I. Aburto (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep.  MBisanz  talk 22:54, 30 July 2019 (UTC)

Reyna I. Aburto
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This subject does not meet WP:BASIC. Coverage in independent, reliable sources consists of minor name checks and meager passing mentions. Sources presented in the previous AfD discussion consist of the same, and primary sources, which does not establish notability. North America1000 14:03, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. North America1000 14:03, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. North America1000 14:03, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nicaragua-related deletion discussions. North America1000 14:03, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Utah-related deletion discussions. North America1000 14:03, 10 July 2019 (UTC)


 * Keep We have mulitple, indepdent sources with articles from papers in multiple cities.John Pack Lambert (talk) 17:15, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Comment – None of those sources provide significant coverage, just name checks and very minor passing, one-sentence mentions consisting of routine coverage. Some sources are primary, consisting of sermon quotations and the like. None of these establish notability. North America1000 22:13, 11 July 2019 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep. I updated the reference list to be more encyclopedic. Per the [|source table which I created here] to assess the sources, most of them are not name checks, one-sentence mentions, as many of the local news sources have more biographical information later in the article. While the sources originating from the church do not establish notability, the other sources do. In my view, these mentions pass WP:BASIC. Rollidan (talk) 20:13, 12 July 2019 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Just Chilling (talk) 15:25, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 06:24, 21 July 2019 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Just Chilling (talk) 17:02, 24 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep meets WP:BASIC.E.M.Gregory (talk) 12:24, 29 July 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.