Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reynold Xin


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (non-admin closure) Nordic   Nightfury  12:34, 5 September 2016 (UTC)

Reynold Xin

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

There is some claim for notability, but most references are about companies he worked in and products he worked for, not about him. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 06:08, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. — Sam Sailor Talk! 09:26, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. — Sam Sailor Talk! 09:26, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. — Sam Sailor Talk! 09:26, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. — Sam Sailor Talk! 09:26, 4 August 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Comment -- not sure, but it appears that there's some walled garden going on with Databricks. I was going to comment as "Redirect" to Databricks, but it appears to be a non-notable company itself, along with its founders. I tagged Databricks for "Notability" and PRODded one of the personnel articles. K.e.coffman (talk) 23:43, 5 August 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:18, 11 August 2016 (UTC)


 * Comment -- Sorry for the format. This is the first entry I added. This guy is perhaps the most influential in the Apache Spark project, which is the largest open source project in big data. He has been cited by a lot of media in the enterprise data space. Just some examples I found via quick Google News:

* http://sdtimes.com/examining-spark-2-0-reynold-xin/ * http://www.cio.com/article/3101842/analytics/databricks-unveils-commercial-support-for-apache-spark-2-0.html * https://adtmag.com/articles/2016/07/27/spark-2-0.aspx * http://siliconangle.com/blog/2016/02/18/a-new-model-of-data-with-streaming-and-spark-sparksummit/ * https://opensource.com/business/15/4/interview-reynold-xin-apache * https://adtmag.com/blogs/dev-watch/2016/05/asf-big-data-projects.aspx * https://adtmag.com/articles/2016/05/12/spark-2-0-preview.aspx * https://www.datanami.com/2016/06/01/merging-batch-streaming-post-lambda-world/ * http://www.informationweek.com/big-data/big-data-analytics/apache-spark-20-preview-googles-amazon-echo-rival-big-data-roundup/d/d-id/1325528 * http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/mongodb-enables-advanced-real-time-analytics-on-fast-moving-data-with-new-connector-for-apache-spark-300290985.html * http://www.eweek.com/database/mongodb-delivers-connector-for-apache-spark.html * https://opensource.com/community/16/2/winners-2016-community-awards * http://www.dbta.com/Editorial/News-Flashes/Spark-16-Release-Continues-to-Make-Spark-Easier-to-Use-108351.aspx * https://www.datanami.com/2015/05/04/deep-dive-into-databricks-big-speedup-plans-for-apache-spark/

He also had a Google Scholar profile with 1500+ citation count. Should we update the page to reflect these? Xuweixuwei (3:44, 15 August 2016 (UTC))  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 04:30, 18 August 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 21:21, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Well, I'd like to see at least a short article, couple paragraphs anyway, in a major daily paper. That, or a full interview or mini-bio in a less notable venue. Not seeing this. There's a mention here in notable Wired... he's quoted, a couple sentences, which is a start, but... WP:GNG wants "significant coverage", defined as that which "addresses the topic directly and in detail"... I'm not seeing that. On the other hand, we are not slaves to WP:GNG, and there're a lot of mini-references which result in a reasonably-detailed, reasonably-well-ref'd article. If pressed I would say the article is maybe worth keeping. Herostratus (talk) 21:01, 31 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Lemongirl942 (talk) 05:48, 4 September 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.