Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reza Kerachian


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Tone 19:32, 28 November 2009 (UTC)

Reza Kerachian

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

No evidence of meeting WP:Notability (academics): Only an associate professor, and "Simply having authored a large number of published academic works is not considered sufficient to satisfy Criterion 1." The fact that this is an autobiography and that the author included his full contact information leads me to think of this as self-promotion and a resume rather than as an encyclopedia article. —Largo Plazo (talk) 21:01, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  -- —Largo Plazo (talk) 21:03, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - fails WP:ACADEMIC; self-promotion per WP:AUTOBIOGRAPHY. MuffledThud (talk) 22:06, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. GS cites are all single digit. Does not appear to satisfy WP:Prof #1. Xxanthippe (talk) 07:02, 22 November 2009 (UTC).
 * Delete, single digit h-index. Abductive  (reasoning) 23:33, 22 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. I doubt very much he will meet WP:PROF anytime soon. Has a grand total of 72 cites on GS, with an h-index of 6.--Eric Yurken (talk) 01:17, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
 * delete More exactly, Scopus confirms it with 36 papers including conference publications, but the highest cite only 12. However, this includes   11 papers from 2009, almost all of them in good journals, so it is reasonable to think there may be considerably more in the future. A clear case of not yet notable.     DGG ( talk ) 17:02, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Despite the usual concern for systemic bias in cases like this, I just don't see any evidence of passing WP:PROF. —David Eppstein (talk) 05:03, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Snow delete. Per all the above.--Epeefleche (talk) 11:46, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.