Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rezurrection


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete.  Kurykh  06:04, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

Rezurrection

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Non notable batch of albums. The artist is a redlink, and none of the album pages assert notability in any way. Absolutely minimal Google hits, no reliable sources to be seen. I am also nominating The Legend Within and Rize of the Spirits‎. J Milburn (talk) 18:39, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:V and WP:MUSIC. -- brew crewer  (yada, yada) 18:49, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per all of above, and - if I may be permitted a non-NPOV statement, the band is sh**. Alloranleon (talk) 09:43, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment: Someone has requested the articles be kept on Talk:Rize of the Spirits. J Milburn (talk) 12:52, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
 * RE above Then it would be helpful for them to lodge a vote here. And sign with ~ . ;) That said, just because the guy says he's a big fan of Rezurrection, doesn't necessarily exonerate the article from its lack of notability... Alloranleon (talk) 15:20, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Couldn't agree more, I just wouldn't like someone's opinion to go unnoticed. J Milburn (talk) 17:08, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
 * I second that :) Alloranleon (talk) 18:55, 3 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete. Not a notable music product per WP:MUSIC, because there is no assertion of reliable and independent non-trivial secondary sources. Dekisugi (talk) 15:24, 3 January 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.