Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rhea, joseph


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. --Sam Blanning(talk) 03:06, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

Rhea, joseph

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

a genealogical article about a non-notable person Calliopejen 15:15, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 12:48, 19 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Keep, unencyclopedic but referenced and surely passes the 100 years test Alf photoman 17:19, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete No assertion of notability. Subject held no important religious positions and does not seem to have been involved in any significant historic events. Greatest claim to notoriety is fathering a Congressman. Caknuck 22:06, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete and watch out. He is one of the many colonial-era figures listed in the genealogical books used as reference. I expect we will be seeing all of the others. Undoubtedly a few will be notable. DGG 04:52, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per Caknuck. Insufficiently notable per WP:BIO. -- Satori Son 13:44, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.