Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rhenald Kasali


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Vanamonde93 (talk) 16:13, 12 January 2024 (UTC)

Rhenald Kasali

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails WP:NACADEMIC, no significant coverage found online. Sgubaldo (talk) 21:04, 21 December 2023 (UTC) Relisting comment: For further discussion around PROF#C1. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 04:13, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Academics and educators,  and Businesspeople. Sgubaldo (talk) 21:04, 21 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Comment. He has a profile on Google Scholar and it says that he has h-index of 29 with 7692	citations. I don't know what is the threshold for notability, but for me it seems pretty impressive.  Delta  space 42 (talk • contribs) 21:11, 21 December 2023 (UTC)
 * h-index is not a great measure of determining reputation. The average h-index will vary quite a bit by discipline for example. It's also specifically noted here that h-index is of limited usefulness in determining notability for academics. Sgubaldo (talk) 01:53, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Indonesia-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:13, 21 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep. Passes Prof. Xxanthippe (talk) 06:19, 22 December 2023 (UTC).
 * Keep. The citation numbers are strong enough for WP:PROF regardless, but I'm especially impressed that he is getting numbers like that for work written in Indonesian. Usually using localized languages for academic work significantly reduces its citability. —David Eppstein (talk) 06:34, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 12:02, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Comment. The sources that are currently in the article look very bad. I trust David Eppstein's assessment though. Geschichte (talk) 11:46, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Keep. Passes WP:NACADEMIC. Over 7700 citations per Google Scholar ans 29 h-index.Perfectstrangerz (talk) 02:57, 12 January 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.