Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rhetorical Strategies Of The Reproductive Rights Agendas


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete -- JForget  22:49, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

Rhetorical Strategies Of The Reproductive Rights Agendas

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

OR Essay, the original editor made it easy with this edit summary "(A work in progress. This intentionally unfinished outline is part of a graded university project.)"  LegoTech &middot;( t )&middot;( c ) 03:39, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. Essay, necessarily unencyclopedic, even if interesting. Wikipedia is not a publisher of your paper. --Dhartung | Talk 03:42, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, though the edit summary quoted in the nom is ROFLMAO. Cirt (talk) 03:54, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NOT and WP:OR. It is truly an essay. Happyme22 (talk) 05:13, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete as uninteresting essay. Phlegm Rooster (talk) 06:52, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per the above. Parsecboy (talk) 13:15, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per above also  ·Add§hore·  T alk /C ont 16:23, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Wonderful essay, but alas, not an encyclopedia article.  Dloh  cierekim  23:59, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Definitely an essay, fails WP:NOT. —  Wen li  (reply here) 02:48, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per above; unsalvageable essay. Khatru2 (talk) 07:44, 31 May 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.