Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rhino Times


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was keep.  howch e  ng   {chat} 18:49, 5 January 2006 (UTC)

Rhino Times
Non-notable newspaper. --Thephotoman 03:49, 27 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete non-notable. Madman 04:55, 27 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. Notable. -- JJay 06:14, 27 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete -- unless more evidence of notability is added. - Longhair 07:36, 27 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep 43k Google hits Compu  ter  Joe  13:50, 27 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, but maybe move to the paper's proper name, Rhinoceros Times. The URL is rhinotimes.com, but that's probably because it's easier to type. -- Vary | Talk 16:22, 27 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Extremely weak keep only because Orson Scott Card writes for it. BTW, Google comes up with less than 600 unique hits for both versions of the name.  User:Zoe|(talk) 22:45, 27 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep notable enough.  Q  Q 22:51, 28 December 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.