Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rhinohide


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Jaranda wat's sup Sports! 01:16, 5 September 2007 (UTC)

Rhinohide

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Not notable; PROD'ed two months ago; PROD challanged ASAP; no subsequent improvements RossPatterson 23:15, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete I am not a true nerd, but the references seem insufficient, and the lack of context is a fatal flaw. Shalom Hello 02:28, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep (I am the primary author.) With regard to notability: It describes middleware that fills a unique technical niche. It is like the Common DOM API, but goes further in providing XML support etc. Not many Java developers need that yet, but for those who do, there is no alternative. For that reason, it is notable. With regard to improvements to article content/format: I can fix most anything, if prompted. But I cannot ref secondary sources till sources appear. That will take time (2 months since last PROD was not long enough). Michael Allan 21:41, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak keep per above. I'll format it. Bearian 19:17, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Done. Looks notable, but there are COI and OR problems. Bearian 19:19, 29 August 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete I'm the person who prod'ed this - it's a nice project, but it's not notable yet since there aren't any secondary sources. Dreamyshade 21:25, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - it seems to be an interesting project, but there doesn't appear to be any reliable soruces to attest to the notability. -- Whpq 15:54, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete gotta agree with the above comments --  Chil dzy  ¤  Ta lk  21:28, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletions.   -- John Vandenberg 00:47, 5 September 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.